Postmodernism and IR Theory

Authors

  • Vivek Mohan Dubey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54945/jjia.v10i2.177

Abstract

IR Theory underwent tremendous contestation within itself since the end of the Cold War. Divergent voices from several theoretical vantage points began to register their strong presence in one of the most fertile areas of social inquiry. Under the influence of Post positivism conventional understanding of IR Theory dominated by Realism and Neorealism and Idealism and Neo liberal Institutionalism has undergone serious disciplinary scrutiny. Critical Theory, Postmodernism, Constructivism, Feminism, Postcolonialism and Environmentalism completely and radically transformed the agenda of IR Theory. This short essay is a modest attempt to explore the role Postmodernism played in the transformation of the theoretical understanding of IR. Before addressing the main issue at hand, it is in order to mention the main tenets of Positivist Philosophy which has left formative influence on the nature of human/cultural/social sciences at least since the Enlightenment against the background of which Postmodernism not only asserted itself after the Second World War but also designed its agenda to be implemented in the theoretical lore of human sciences in general and IR Theory in particular. Let me begin with the definition of Positivism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-03-23

How to Cite

Dubey, V. M. (2023). Postmodernism and IR Theory. Jindal Journal of International Affairs, 10(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.54945/jjia.v10i2.177

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Ashley, Richard, (1989), “Living on Borderlines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War” in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, ed. by James Der Derian and Michael Shapiro, Lexington Books.

Ashley, Richard, (1995), “The Power of Anarchy: Theory, Sovereignty, and the Domestication of Global Life” in International Theory: Critical Investigations, Macmillan Press Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_6

Bartelson, Jens, (1995), A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586385

Hunter, Bruce,

George, Jim and Campbell, David, (1990), “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations,” International Studies Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600570

Lyon, David, (1994), Postmodernity, Buckingham: Open University Press.

Lyotard, Jean Francois, (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278

Rosenau, Pauline Marie, (1992), Post-Modernism And the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, Intrusions, Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820610

Seidman, Steven and Wagner, David G., (1992), Postmodernism and Social Theory, Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Skinner, Quentin, ed. (1997), The Return of Grand Theory in Human Sciences, Cambridge University Press.